<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equatoria teak - is it an acceptable alternative to Burma teak?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intheboatshed.net/2008/03/29/equatoria-teak-is-it-an-acceptable-alternative-to-burma-teak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intheboatshed.net/2008/03/29/equatoria-teak-is-it-an-acceptable-alternative-to-burma-teak/</link>
	<description>A weblog about great boats, boatbuilding and restoration. And sheds, of course!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Johansson</title>
		<link>http://intheboatshed.net/2008/03/29/equatoria-teak-is-it-an-acceptable-alternative-to-burma-teak/#comment-11457</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Johansson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheboatshed.net/2008/03/29/equatoria-teak-is-it-an-acceptable-alternative-to-burma-teak/#comment-11457</guid>
		<description>Having in-depth knowledge indeed, we can say that the African teak mentioned will hardly receive any FSC certification the nearest decades to come. 
There is a thorough survey done spring 1999 by a Swedish team on the extent of the gazetted, but never planted, teak plantations in Southern Sudan and their potentials. The access to high quality teak is very limited indeed - by many various reasons. Also, supporting one side of a war by contributing with money for weapons will automatically make the buyer a target for the other side.
That different government sponsored aid organisations have small projects and food programs in the communities around a teak plantation doesn't necessarily mean anything at all.
Plantation teak elsewhere - for example the 3,2 million acres in Indonesia - is always an alternative, though it demands a lot of selecting and lower recovery rates.

Tony
EuroDesign Group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having in-depth knowledge indeed, we can say that the African teak mentioned will hardly receive any FSC certification the nearest decades to come.<br />
There is a thorough survey done spring 1999 by a Swedish team on the extent of the gazetted, but never planted, teak plantations in Southern Sudan and their potentials. The access to high quality teak is very limited indeed - by many various reasons. Also, supporting one side of a war by contributing with money for weapons will automatically make the buyer a target for the other side.<br />
That different government sponsored aid organisations have small projects and food programs in the communities around a teak plantation doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean anything at all.<br />
Plantation teak elsewhere - for example the 3,2 million acres in Indonesia - is always an alternative, though it demands a lot of selecting and lower recovery rates.</p>
<p>Tony<br />
EuroDesign Group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://intheboatshed.net/2008/03/29/equatoria-teak-is-it-an-acceptable-alternative-to-burma-teak/#comment-11383</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheboatshed.net/2008/03/29/equatoria-teak-is-it-an-acceptable-alternative-to-burma-teak/#comment-11383</guid>
		<description>I agree, the FSC mean that the teak is managed, i think this is the best source it gives stable income to countrys that rarely have such a thing. please lets change the boat industry. no one in other types of wood work activity can use rain forest wood , so boat owners should make a stand and join in this scheme. the consumer has thepower to help make a change through their informed choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the FSC mean that the teak is managed, i think this is the best source it gives stable income to countrys that rarely have such a thing. please lets change the boat industry. no one in other types of wood work activity can use rain forest wood , so boat owners should make a stand and join in this scheme. the consumer has thepower to help make a change through their informed choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Partridge</title>
		<link>http://intheboatshed.net/2008/03/29/equatoria-teak-is-it-an-acceptable-alternative-to-burma-teak/#comment-11142</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Partridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 08:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheboatshed.net/2008/03/29/equatoria-teak-is-it-an-acceptable-alternative-to-burma-teak/#comment-11142</guid>
		<description>This stuff comes from Africa, mainly Tanzania and Southern Sudan. The project is funded by...you and me! One of the backers is CDC Group, a British taxpayer-funded operation that funds economic activity in Africa. The Tanzanian teak farm has come in for quite a bit of local criticism - see http://www.theexpress.com/express%20357/business/business_opinion.htm.
I'm not sure how true this is, but it's got to be better than getting teak from Burma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stuff comes from Africa, mainly Tanzania and Southern Sudan. The project is funded by&#8230;you and me! One of the backers is CDC Group, a British taxpayer-funded operation that funds economic activity in Africa. The Tanzanian teak farm has come in for quite a bit of local criticism - see <a href="http://www.theexpress.com/express%20357/business/business_opinion.htm"  rel="nofollow">http://www.theexpress.com/express%20357/business/business_opinion.htm</a>.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure how true this is, but it&#8217;s got to be better than getting teak from Burma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
